Star Wars: The prequel edition

    “Ladies and gentlemen, you wanted the best, you got the best. The hottest band in the world, KISS!”

I wasn’t planning to do a Star Wars Ep. III post, not because of me, but because I felt nobody would give a crap about it. Me, my bipolarity has come to manifest itself as a complete inability to write anything positive or negative about the new movie. As it is, I’m stuck right in the middle, knowing that it’s a bad movie, but not being able to contain my excitement over watching it again.

(This is part one of a two-post series, which I’ll wrap up sometime this week.)


I have a crazy feeling that Episode III will reveal itself to be just plain bad on repeated viewings. As it stands, yes, it’s the best of the prequels. By far, I might add. It’s also a mighty fine Star Wars movie. It entertains, even as it bludgeons you with such clunkers as “She has lost the will to live” and “Chewbacca, miss you, I will”. But since now, as the emperor would say, “The circle is complete”, we can look at the Star Wars prequels as a whole.

(Flashback alert!)

Does anybody remember way before Episode I hit, what we expected from the prequels? I do:

Alvarete’s top 3 list of expected stuff from the Star Wars Prequels (In no particular order)

  • Anaking hooks up with Padme
  • Jedis die
  • Anakin turns to Vader

There were also a few issues that I wanted fleshed out, like the relationship between Anakin and Obi Wan, the Jedi Council, and, of course, massive light-saber fights. But, if you think about it, the prequels had a relatively small amount of terrain to cover. Plus, we already knew what happened (sort of). We knew who lived and who died, the old adage “It’s about the journey, not the destination” should’ve been the operational motto of the prequels. Instead, let’s sum up Episode I and II:

Alvarete’s top 3 list of key Star Wars plot points explained during Episode I (In no particular order)

  • Jedi powers come from midichlorians
  • Nothing much happens
  • Really, nothing happens

Alvarete’s top 3 list of key Star Wars plot points explained during Episode II (In no particular order)

  • Jedi are stupid
  • Clones!
  • Anakin and Padme like each other

(Oh yeah, spoiler alert. If you haven’t watched the sequels, I just screwed them up for you. Go me!)

Seriously, five hours of combined prequel, and nothing happens. Nothing that couldn’t have been explained during the first half of a movie with reasonably paced storytelling. Instead, we get all these extraneous set pieces that last forever, like a 20-minute pod racing segment. Oh, and Jar-Jar Binks. And midichlorians. And Darth Maul. I’m entertained by the pretty pictures and the ass-kicking, I really am. But the fact is that, fanboy giddiness aside, the prequels reek of poor story-telling, and the rational half of me refuses to mark them as “good movies because they’re Star Wars”. As movies, they are absolutely abysmal, and if I was not a huge Star Wars I would probably just dismiss them as such and move on, but what amounts to salting the wound is how impressive other products based on Star Wars have turned out to be, which points out the strength of the property and Lucas’ failure to let Star Wars be truly great. I’m not a Lucas hater, the man is a brilliant visual stylist, but Empire and Jedi prove that the better Star Wars came when he influenced the result but didn’t direct it. Conversely, he gets a chance to touch up the Original Trilogy, and what does he do? Add song and dance numbers to every freaking film. Make Greedo shoot first. I can’t imagine anybody watching the OT and going “You know, these movies could be great, if only they had more songs sprinkled in…”

In the end, you and I know that the real issue about the prequels wasn’t whether to watch them or not. It was a given, from the day the “Episode I is a go” news spread across the world. One of the reasons I wasn’t too keen on writing about any of them was that they’re Star Wars, and, as such, there’s really no reason to review them. Either you get “it”, or you don’t. I’ve always worn my geek credentials on my sleeve, and I got “it”, the whole enchilada: midichlorians, wooden dialogues, pod races and Frankenstein homages. As of today, I’m not even bitter about what could’ve been.

I’m just glad it’s over.

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Ultram. on 21 Jul 2008 at 5:17 pm

    Low dose naltrexone with ultram….

    Buy ultram….

  2. People fucking at halloween. on 05 Aug 2008 at 10:25 pm

    People fucking caught on security cameras….

    Pictures of people fucking. People fucking caught on security cameras. People fucking. Black people fucking. Old people fucking. People fucking vids. Fat people fucking….

  3. Men licking pussy. on 07 Aug 2008 at 4:16 am

    Pussy licking porn….

    Pussy licking movies. Pussy licking. Finger licking pussy. Pussy licking videos. Pussy licking porn. Adult pussy licking. Lesbians licking pussy….

Comments

  1. alvarete wrote:

    Please, if you’re comments even hint at “you’re not a fan”, don’t post them. I know Kitt Fisto. I know Watt Tambor. I know Salacious Crumb. I noticed Moff Tarkin in Revenge. Hell, I cheered when they mentioned Kashyyk. Do you know Kitt Fisto without looking it up on google? Don’t tell me I’m not a fucking fan.

    With that said, carry on.

  2. dorothy hale wrote:

    I hope it’s not over…I want so badly to see the Episode VII, where Leia becomes a Jedi and Luke turns bad…

    On the other hand, i’m glad you didn’t do a post saying only how bad the movie was (like everyone else)…It pisses me off. I mean after all it’s just a movie.

  3. alvarete wrote:

    “Just a movie? Just a movie?! Don’t you ever say an unkind word about Star Wars. Me and lunch-box here modelled our whole lives around Han and Chewie. I’m a smooth pimp daddy who looooves the pussy, and this is my black man-servant!”

  4. alvarete wrote:

    Oh, and for the record, you can’t become a Jedi. Leia is a Jedi, she just hasn’t tapped her powers yet.

    By the way, metal bikini? I’d tap that.

  5. dorothy hale wrote:

    You’re such a geek sometimes…. ;)

  6. Schiz Cum Snake wrote:

    No she isn’t, she wasn’t even a candidate. She is a potential Jedi knight at best.

    And Qui Gon never said that Jedi powers come from midichlorians. Midichlorians just show how much Jedi potential someone has. I’m cool with those pesky little things, they make sense to me.

  7. dorothy hale wrote:

    In Anakin’s case, didnt’ he come just from midichlorians and was implanted (miraclously) in his mom egg?? I remember a discussion with my mom, because she thought Star Wars was copying the way Baby Jesus was conceived in Virgin Mary’s utero….and they were playing with religion, the chosen one..etc, etc…

    Anyway, will any of you geeks clear this up for me please???

  8. alvarete wrote:

    Yes, Anakin was conceived from midichlorians. In the third one, Palpatine even drops the story about Darth Plagueis, the Sith Lord who had power over life and death, to the point where he could “create life”. One of the rules of story telling is that if you show a gun in the first act, in the second act it must go off. If so, then I’ll leave it to you to put two and two together. And if not, why would George Lucas, a director not precisely known for his subtlety, leave that plot string dangling there?

  9. nashira wrote:

    The funny -as in ironic- thing about “getting it” and similar ad hoc fan mantras, is that when it comes to comparing Star Trek and Star Wars, it’s never about “getting it”. It’s about lots of stuff that have to do with the characters, the acting, the scripts, the directing, the composer, the special effects…

    Placing oneself in an unexistant dichothomy of getting it or not, closes the door for any kind of discussion, critic, dialogue, etc.

    Personally, I don’t think Star Wars is the kind of phenomenom people get it or not. It’s a massive and mainstream set of movies with very strong geek appeal. It’s not like you’re talking about obscure manga authors, Strongbad, and so on. Get it or not is something you say when acquired (or even instant) taste is not the way of enjoyment, as it usually happens with food. Take sushi, for instance. Now you vomit it, ten years later you love it. Spanish humour: I don’t get it. Alvarete’s jokes is Spain: they’ll never get them.

  10. alvarete wrote:

    I merely made that comment to dissuade anybody from using the “omg, you’re not a fan stfu!!!!1 lolz!” angle, which I’m sure would’ve popped up. Anyway, great Star Trek troll!

  11. nashira wrote:

    I’m a hardcore trekkie, you.. you… how do you call yourselves? Wookies?

    Anyway, we’ve (as in the plural of “I, trekkie”) got better lines than you. At least, we’ve got our generous share of kitschy recicled Shakespeare quotes in every other episode and even in some movie titles.

  12. alvarete wrote:

    Whoah, colour me impressed!

    Or not.

  13. nashira wrote:

    Of all the paths you could’ve chosen in the not-getting-it territory, I must say, in your behalf, that you took the most elegant one.

    Chalito would be proud of you.

  14. wolf wrote:

    What if…

    wait, first of all… hi to everybody this is my first post in the new site (nice work Al).

    now, what if the prelude trilogy was showed first as it should be, what if in 1977 instead of A New Hope Lucas showed you Episode 1 (with the special fx of that time), and all the wait was for the second trilogy. In this scenario by the time A New Hope was release you would have know about the twins, “Luke, I am your father” will be like… yeah, it was about time, “There’s another Skywalker” will be like… tell me something we don’t know, and the waiting could have been the final confrontation and the death of the emperor (by that time everyone would have know).
    So what’s my point?, to me Star Wars don’t have to be a “good” movie, i enjoy everyone of them for what they are, the fact that you have certain things you expect or want to see in the precuels demonstrate why some people don’t like those. Expectations are the enemy of a good experience at the theater, my advice… enjoy the ride, it’s Star Wars, i don’t care how many mistakes George Lucas did in the entire series, and i don’t mind if he ever graduated from film school, thanks to those movies he did back in the 70’s and 80’s we have a new look at special FX, imagine LotR without FX (with john lennon as Frodo hehe).
    oh and i don’t hate Jar Jar, and yes i hate the “extras” in Jedi.

  15. alvarete wrote:

    Actually, of the edits in the original series, the one that was truly unnecessary was removing the Endor celebration with the Ewok song. I loved that crap when I was a kid, and given his propensity to add new song numbers, I don’t understand why he would remove the one song that was there in the first place…

    The mind boggles.

  16. Chase Ransom wrote:

    Except for the sole purpose of exasperating nashira, I am done with my ongoing argument in favor of Star Wars.

    Alvarete: four words for you: Charlie’s Angels Full Throttle. Shame on you. Tsk tsk.

    However I award you 10 points for making the obscure reference of Salacious Crumb. Who doesnt love that intergalactic rat? (and a playboy might I add).

    Leia in a metal bikini = ditto

    Baby Jesus and the Virgin Mary’s utero? Did I accidentally get forwarded to one of those Christian dating sites?

    Great line from Episode IV: “I find your lack of faith disturbing”

    F it.

  17. Schiz Cum Snake wrote:

    Chase:

    You assume too much.

    four words for you: Charlie’s Angels Full Throttle. Shame on you.

    Fist fucking Jesus on a pogo stick.

    I just saw that cinematic abortion last night. Now that was one traumatic brain surgery that will be hard for me to get over. It has to be the most idiotic action movie evah! No hyperbole intended. EVAH!

  18. Blind Willie wrote:

    Final thoughts on whether “getting it or not” qualifies as a valid way to judge a SciFi movie: Nashira, if the story grows on you (if you get it), you instantly become partial. This will mean you’ll feel compelled to defend it, and overlook mayor or minor structural problems such as mediocre dialogues, corny situations and cliches. You’ll even find within yourself creative reasons for liking that particular film, and if everything else fails, you’ll play the acquired taste card. Why? because in our hearts we know are all sophists.

    Hell, you might even blind yourself and block from all rationality, to the point of embracing Captain Piccard and the all the rest of the Faggy Nerd Squad of the Enterprise.

    JA, JA, JA!…I’m kidding. You know it, right?, right?

  19. alvarete wrote:

    I liked Charlie’s Angele, THE FIRST ONE, not Full Throttle. Full Throttle wasn’t half as good as the first one.

    Woops, I might have said too much…

  20. dorothy hale wrote:

    I was thinking about the sequel’s list someone made the other day….Definetely Kill Bill should have been there.

    Charlie’s Angels??? god….I’ll take instead Starsky & Hutch any day…

  21. wolf wrote:

    Man… what did you see in any of the Charlie’s angels movies, except the angels… but to like a movie just for the babes in it, damn!!!

  22. nashira wrote:

    Chase Ransom, Blind Willie: don’t push it. I hate to love you. Dammit.

    Engage!

  23. Chase Ransom wrote:

    Alvarete:

    You’ll never live down your two thumbs up for ANYTHING Charlie’s Angels. When we’re 80 years old and looking back on our lives, despite my advanced senility and memory loss, I’ll rub it in yer face.

    The Borg is the only good thing to come from the entire Star Trek buffet of *kof*rap. Seven of Nine, I’d tap that.

    F it.

  24. alvarete wrote:

    Saying that Kill Bill II is a sequel to Kill Bill is like saying that The Two Towers is a sequel to Fellowship of the Ring…

    For the record, the Charlie’s Angels chicks suck. And I don’t mean that in a good way.

  25. nashira wrote:

    Seven of Nine is like the worst borg ever, right before that dumb “Hugh”, better known in his intimate circle as Three of Five. But Seven of Nine… For heaven’s sake, SEVEN OF NINE IS A FEMALE BORG IN HIGH HEELS!!!!! What’s to like about that?

    Uhm. Ok.

  26. wolf wrote:

    Good point, but it’s still another movie. So how do you define it, it’s like matrix, reloaded and revolutions were like one movie split in two just like kill bill, so wtf are they??? here the universe cease to exist.

    I’ll never understand what you saw in Charlie’s angels then. lol

  27. Blind Willie wrote:

    Alvarete:

    I think it’s time to play the “acquired taste” card, man.

  28. alvarete wrote:

    Charlie’s Angels is an acquired taste, it grows on you…

  29. Chase Ransom wrote:

    Like mold and mildew - it grows on you.

  30. Mozalbete wrote:

    Charlie’s Angels??? god….I’ll take instead Starsky & Hutch any day…

    I know you would honey..

    ..

    …I know you would ;)

    What? You never heard of no Black-Irish? Who do you think invented the Mc Rib, Lucky Charms?, Shamrock Shake?. Shame on you for asking for my doggone papers.

  31. alvarete wrote:

    God bless Starsky & Hutch, even if only because that god-awful shit of a movie gave us the quote “Why are you touching him?!”

  32. alvarete wrote:

    Oh, btw, I’d tap 7 of 9 too. That “collective consciousness” thing might be dah proverbial “bomb”.

  33. dorothy hale wrote:

    This is a disturbing article:

    http://www.boingboing.net/

    “Last word (we hope) on odd Star Trek/pedo connection”

    Seriously, i think is a bad publicity for Star Trek fans and Star Wars also (i include myself)…But is there really a connection??? i mean probably pedophiles are hung on child toys, but mostly as a weapon than as a true interest…

  34. alvarete wrote:

    The pedo - Star Trek connection is retarded. It’s like running an investigation on wife beaters, noting that a lot, if not all of them, like to watch sports no TV, and linking wife-beating to sports-watching.

    Retarded isn’t even a strong enough word for this. Hooray for near-sighted journalism!

    PS - Not a trekkie, I just like making fun of them.

  35. Blind Willie wrote:

    On a lighter note, for all you comic reading, Greatful Dead haters, you might wanna check out “Black Heart Billy”.

    http://www.grasshopperscomics.com/search_main.php?action=showbook&bookid=244&invid=242

    If someone already has, let me know.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*

*